Slika omota

Against the Fetishisation of Plural Time

It has become an unflinching belief that time is plural and temporal multiplicity is the best framework to study the relationship between time and society. Through a critical reading of existing scholarship, Sinha questions the burgeoning fetish of plural time. Using an expanded notion of social his...

Cijeli opis

Spremljeno u:
Glavni autor: Sinha, Nitin
Format: Online
Jezik:engleski
Izdano: De Gruyter 2025
Teme:
Social History of Time
Modern Time
Plural Temporalities
South Asia
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology::JHBA Social theory
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPA Political science and theory
thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHA History: theory and methods
Online pristup:ONIX_20250822T115951_9783111697215_18
Oznake: Dodaj oznaku
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!
Sažetak:It has become an unflinching belief that time is plural and temporal multiplicity is the best framework to study the relationship between time and society. Through a critical reading of existing scholarship, Sinha questions the burgeoning fetish of plural time. Using an expanded notion of social history, the prevailing trend in the theory and practice of history is questioned by emphasizing to distinguish between time and temporality.

Slični predmeti