Marco analítico de modelos policiales de seguridad pública para disminuir la incidencia delictiva en Culiacán, Sinaloa
The General Coordination of the State Council of Public Security (CESP) reports that in the first half of 2024, six crimes increased in Sinaloa: extortion (150%), deprivation (28%), kidnapping (20%), manslaughter (18%), domestic violence (14%) and rape (2%). These crimes represent a direct impact on...
Kaydedildi:
| Asıl Yazarlar: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Online |
| Dil: | İspanyolca |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
High Rate Consulting
2025
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | ONIX_20250207_9798991590228_20 |
| Etiketler: |
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
| Özet: | The General Coordination of the State Council of Public Security (CESP) reports that in the first half of 2024, six crimes increased in Sinaloa: extortion (150%), deprivation (28%), kidnapping (20%), manslaughter (18%), domestic violence (14%) and rape (2%). These crimes represent a direct impact on vulnerable groups such as children, women and the elderly. Given this, the increase in domestic violence and rape continue to be one of the main pending issues for local authorities. The central objective is to design a proposal with technical suggestions based on good practices and international public security standards for the reduction of crime in Culiacan, Sinaloa. The study is explanatory and transversal with a qualitative approach. The qualitative instrument uses the documentary technique and a semi-structured interview guide. Both tools contribute to the design of an analytical scheme for measuring the quality of the institutional arrangement that configures an efficient public security model. The results of the interviews indicate that corruption and influence peddling affect the police model. Furthermore, the lack of knowledge of the law by public servants, insufficient budget, poor equipment, failure to address the causes of crime and deterrence, lack of immediate response to citizens’ calls, little motivation and recognition of good elements, etc., impacts the efficiency of the model. Also, the analysis of the 11 public security models reveals distinctive and complementary characteristics, as well as the possibility of combining them with others. In conclusion, security is not the result of leadership that guides groups or organizations towards transformation and stability, but rather, governance is driven by the differences between the various political and social actors, despite such asymmetries, making it possible to build an agenda with common interests. |
|---|