Fake News in der Online-Kommunikation
For as long as anyone can remember, fake news has been a central problem for the formation of individual and public opinion. Today, the effect of widespread disinformation is amplified by the technical possibilities of online communication, such as echo chambers in social networks or the use of arti...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Online |
| Hizkuntza: | alemana |
| Argitaratua: |
Universitätsverlag Göttingen
2024
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | OCN: 1428751096 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
|
| _version_ | 1863729856818184192 |
|---|---|
| author | Nölscher, Patrick |
| author_browse | Nölscher, Patrick |
| author_facet | Nölscher, Patrick |
| author_sort | Nölscher, Patrick |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | For as long as anyone can remember, fake news has been a central problem for the formation of individual and public opinion. Today, the effect of widespread disinformation is amplified by the technical possibilities of online communication, such as echo chambers in social networks or the use of artificial opinion amplifiers. From a cognitive science perspective, it is very difficult to correct the effects of disinformation once it has been expressed. The paper therefore deals with the protection of fake news in online communication under fundamental law on the basis of the case law of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the European Court of Human Rights and an epistemological view, taking into account newer communication modalities such as content dissemination in social networks and video sharing services as well as the dissemination of statements with the help of social bots. After describing the constitutional regulatory framework of the dissemination of fake news, the work is devoted to their regulation in Germany de lege lata. On the one hand, the paper focuses on explaining and evaluating the existing regulation of social bots under the Interstate Treaty on the Media (MStV), taking into account higher-ranking law. On the other hand, the thesis discusses and evaluates the regulation of social networks and video sharing services on the basis of the more recent Digital Services Act (DSA) in comparison to the Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) and points out areas of tension under basic communications law. Based on the insights gained from the evaluations of existing regulation and the constitutional standards described in relation to the dissemination of disinformation, it is possible to formulate options for action for the (German) legislator that could increase protection against the influence of disinformation on individual and public opinion formation in the context of social bot communication and communication in social networks as well as video sharing services. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-137125 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | ger |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Universitätsverlag Göttingen |
| publisherStr | Universitätsverlag Göttingen |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1371252025-04-03T12:54:58Z Fake News in der Online-Kommunikation Nölscher, Patrick constitutional regulatory framework Digital Services Act (DSA) Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) Interstate Treaty on the Media (MStV) bic Book Industry Communication::L Law For as long as anyone can remember, fake news has been a central problem for the formation of individual and public opinion. Today, the effect of widespread disinformation is amplified by the technical possibilities of online communication, such as echo chambers in social networks or the use of artificial opinion amplifiers. From a cognitive science perspective, it is very difficult to correct the effects of disinformation once it has been expressed. The paper therefore deals with the protection of fake news in online communication under fundamental law on the basis of the case law of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the European Court of Human Rights and an epistemological view, taking into account newer communication modalities such as content dissemination in social networks and video sharing services as well as the dissemination of statements with the help of social bots. After describing the constitutional regulatory framework of the dissemination of fake news, the work is devoted to their regulation in Germany de lege lata. On the one hand, the paper focuses on explaining and evaluating the existing regulation of social bots under the Interstate Treaty on the Media (MStV), taking into account higher-ranking law. On the other hand, the thesis discusses and evaluates the regulation of social networks and video sharing services on the basis of the more recent Digital Services Act (DSA) in comparison to the Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) and points out areas of tension under basic communications law. Based on the insights gained from the evaluations of existing regulation and the constitutional standards described in relation to the dissemination of disinformation, it is possible to formulate options for action for the (German) legislator that could increase protection against the influence of disinformation on individual and public opinion formation in the context of social bot communication and communication in social networks as well as video sharing services. 2024-05-12T08:59:20Z 2024-05-12T08:59:20Z 2024-03-30T04:31:42Z 2023 book OCN: 1428751096 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/88770 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/137125 ger open access image/jpeg image/jpeg image/jpeg Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/88770/1/GSOER19_noelscher.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/88770/1/GSOER19_noelscher.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/88770/1/GSOER19_noelscher.pdf Universitätsverlag Göttingen 10.17875/gup2023-2438 10.17875/gup2023-2438 af9011e0-03b9-4a5c-9ae6-b9da4898d1b2 AG Universitätsverlage open access |
| spellingShingle | constitutional regulatory framework Digital Services Act (DSA) Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) Interstate Treaty on the Media (MStV) bic Book Industry Communication::L Law Nölscher, Patrick Fake News in der Online-Kommunikation |
| title | Fake News in der Online-Kommunikation |
| title_full | Fake News in der Online-Kommunikation |
| title_fullStr | Fake News in der Online-Kommunikation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fake News in der Online-Kommunikation |
| title_short | Fake News in der Online-Kommunikation |
| title_sort | fake news in der online kommunikation |
| topic | constitutional regulatory framework Digital Services Act (DSA) Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) Interstate Treaty on the Media (MStV) bic Book Industry Communication::L Law |
| topic_facet | constitutional regulatory framework Digital Services Act (DSA) Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) Interstate Treaty on the Media (MStV) bic Book Industry Communication::L Law |
| url | OCN: 1428751096 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nolscherpatrick fakenewsinderonlinekommunikation |